|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
August 18, 2005
A Radioactive Tsunami?
Many Serious Questions, One Devious Answer: S. P. Udayakumar wrote about the effect of the Tsunami of the Nuclear Power facilities in India pointing out how they were not as safe as they were made out to be and that there were major holes in the stories presented by the Indian government. In the first part, he presented a mock interview with the administration. Ever since the tsunami killer waves pounded the coast of Tamil Nadu on December 26, 2004, the nuclear-literate in India have been very much worried about the radioactive repercussions in the Madras Atomic Power Station (MAPS) at Kalpakkam, near Chennai. The “Ordinary Citizens” of India have many questions, concerns, anxieties, worries and fears but the “Advanced/Atomic Citizens” of India keep repeating the same answer. The conversation may go like this: [1] OC: What happened when the tsunami waves hit the Atomic Energy Township of Madras Atomic Power Station (MAPS) at Kalpakkam, near Chennai? [2] OC: What happened when the same ferocious waves pounded the MAPS nuclear reactor site a few kilometers down the same line? [3] OC: Were the nuclear waste storage plant and the reprocessing plant affected? [4] OC: I hear that the Kalpakkam Nuclear Power Station Casual Contract Laborers Federation leader is claiming that some 200 to 300 contract-laborers are missing after the tsunami? [5] OC: The Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) personnel who were supposed to safeguard the MAPS workers and secure the installations themselves lost a few people in their barracks. Do you think they functioned effectively in the wake of the disaster? [6] OC: When the waves hit MAPS and the township, you momentarily lost all contact with the government officials and the rest of the world as the telephone exchange was flooded. Some workers with mobile connections of private phone companies alone could call outside; is that right? [7] OC: On December 26, 2004, did MAPS look like a desolate place with no power, no phones, no water, no security arrangement, and no hindrance whatsoever for outsiders to enter any part of the plant? [8] OC: Were the foundation pits for the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactors (PFBR) inundated by the tsunami waters? [9] OC: Hundreds of construction workers are said to have been saved by a crane operator who had seen the rising seas and you had no mechanism whatsoever to alert your own workers or to safeguard them, right? [10] OC: What would happen if a future tsunami suddenly inundates the PFBR plants that will have liquid sodium as coolant? [11] OC: Besides some three thousand regular employees, you still employ more than thousand “glow slaves” (intentionally irradiated unwilling nuclear laborers) to keep the “undocumented radiation release” under cover, right? [12] OC: Why are your own workers approaching the Chennai High Court complaining that there is a serious lack of qualified technical personnel at critical positions of the MAPS reactors and alleging that such a trend compromises the safety of the plant and the workers and the general public? [13] OC: Why did the Prime Minister of India ask the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) chief Mr. Anil Kakodkar to stay put at Kalpakkam after the tsunami? [14] OC: Mr. Kakodkar spent so much time at the reactor sites but never visited the Township even to console his own workers and their families. Why this anti-people attitude? [15] OC: Why are people of Kalpakkam area still hush-hushing about a possible radiation leak? [16] OC: Why can’t you let a group of independent experts inspect the MAPS plants with radiation detection equipment? [17] OC: Why don’t you and the Government of India want the UN Secretary General visit Tamil Nadu? Is it because he and other aid agencies would catch the air of Kalpakkam developments? [18] OC: There are reports that some 15,000 families were removed from Kalpakkam on December 27, 2004 as a precautionary measure and the Indian Army was deployed to “protect” the plants from outside intrusions. Are they true? [19] OC: Why can’t you have a modicum of TAP (transparency, accountability and people’s participation) in your functioning and allay the legitimate fears of the Indian public in the wake of the tsunami disaster? [20] OC: How should we feel about the long-term threats of radioactive leaks? [21] OC: Why can’t we have an open and credible investigation of the precise extent of the consequences of the tsunami disaster? Related Links Comments
Post a comment
|
Take Action
Clean Water for Bhopal Threat to Life of Advocate for Dalit Rights Dow Paid Bribes; Indian Government Takes No Action Listen to Radio S.Asia Cartoons ARCHIVED ARTICLESPeople and Changes- Peace Cyclists Approach New Delhi - Women of Zaheerabad take on Monsanto Environment - The Identities of Governance - Farmers Rally Against Special Economic Zones Education - Conundrums of Education - Government Drops Right to Education Bill Governance - Party Games - Villages and Communities Against Nuclear Plant in Koodankulam Health - India: Living Positively despite HIV - Urbanization, Slums, Our Health Human Rights - Sri Lanka on the Precipice: Political Solution or Sweeping Debacle? - Gender Ratio Affects Marriage Norms in UP - Threat to Life of Advocate for Dalit Rights - Post Nithari, Awareness Campaigns by Organizations Ecomomy - What is Walmart doing with Wholesale in India? - 70 Farmer Suicides in Vidarbha - in 2007 Media - Social Profile of Indian Media - Journalist Refuses to Accept Award from Musharraf Culture - Rebranding Pakistan - View from the West Powered by |