Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India The South Asian Maldives Nepal Pakistan Srilanka

December 18, 2005
A Secret Investment Deal in Orissa

On June 22nd 2005, the State Government of Orissa has signed an MoU with the Pohang Steel Company (POSCO) of South Korea. 6 months since the signing of the deal, very little is known about the details of this MoU

According to the MoU, POSCO will construct a steel plant at Paradeep in Jagat Singhpur district of Orissa with an annual production capacity of 12 million tonnes steel with the plant planning to produce 3 million tonnes of steel by the year 2010 and 12 million tonnes by 2016. The company will spend Rs 51,000 crore for this plant in phases.

However, the Orissa State Government led by Mr Naveen Patnaik has been very secretive about the details of the MoU. It is not clear how much coal, Iron ore or utilities will be provided by the state and at what cost. Very little has been presented about the roadmap of the plant.

It is ironic that the government has been unwilling to share information about the biggest Foreign Direct Investment project. Surely this begs the question – Why?

The resources of Orissa are not personal property of the government of Orissa or of Mr Naveen Patnaik. They are the representative of Orissa and are obliged to present the details of the deal to the people of Orissa – even the larger Indian community.

In addition, given the size of this project, we expect that there will be significant logistical and operational aspects that will directly affect the people of Orissa. How is the state government planning to deal with this? There is no doubt that this plant will produce large amounts of mining and processing waste – how will this be treated and where will this be dumped? Surely the people have the right to know?

The plant and its operations will also surely displace thousands of people. What plans does the state government have in terms of rehabilitation of these displaced people? This question gains added importance given that those displaced by the Hirakud project have still not been given land or otherwise rehabilitated.

The non-transparent nature of this process is suspicious. In the past we have had numerous state governments signing MoUs with various corporations in non-transparent manner. Enron comes to mind rather quickly. In each of these cases, the terms of the agreement were heavily stacked against the people who are still bearing the cost of these deals.

This project is not one of state security – why then has the government consistently avoided presenting the details. What does it have to hide? In fact, instead of answering these questions Mr Patnaik has opted present regional and nationalistic rhetoric.

It is unfortunate that the Chief Minister is suggesting to Oriya that being patriotic or caring about Orissa implies we not ask questions of our representatives. It seems ironic that transparency in governance is being presented as against the interest of Orissa.

It is also rather unfortunate that besides an initial opposition – that seemed more the nature of opposing government than a principled stance against such a process – the media, the political opposition and the larger civic society in Orissa has largely left the issue unquestioned.

What goodies will POSCO bag away and what will the people of Orissa pay? That is a question that cannot be left unanswered.

- Sanat Mohanty

Related Links
Lathi Charge of Tribals in Orissa
Address to President Kalam
The Recipe for Creating Slums
A Space for Mr Pattnayak

Posted by collective at December 18, 2005 10:47 PM
Comments

Why don't you invoke provisions of RTI Act and get copies of MoU with POSCO? Why call CM Orissa secretive when GOI without whose clearance no FDI of POSCO scale can be cornered by a State is not being targetted for secrecy?
May I suggest that you better stop giving skewed views and air news based on facts and not on surmises?
Collect facts from GOI if GOO does not give you. Without GOI clearance no foreign investment (what to talk of a scale as big as POSCO) can take place.
For my failure to collect data, should I blame GOO and serve my views as news?

Posted by: Sahadeva Sahoo on January 14, 2006 11:24 AM

A text of the memorandum of June 22 is available at this website.
http://orissagov.nic.in/posco/POSCO-MoU.htm

The cost details are so scanty that there appear to be many hidden clauses regarding license fee / royalty payable for captive mining right etc.

Yet the memorandum gives some essential features of the agreement such as vast expanse of land requirements, township, right to swap iron ores through export, additional ores for their own mines in South Korea, right to build road, rail and port infrastructure, making their project area into a SEZ etc.

Posted by: K.V.A. iyer on July 27, 2006 05:20 AM

sir i need more about news on land rehabitation and what our state govt has decided

Ed: Unfortunately, the government does not seem to share that information

Posted by: subrat sarangi on September 21, 2006 05:33 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?